Celpip AIPractice Test Try a scored task

Conversion chart

CELPIP Reading Score Chart

Every raw score out of 38, with the CELPIP level the published table gives it and the honest range we report for it. The CELPIP level is also your CLB level. These are estimates from published material, not official scores.

Open the interactive score calculator

The full reading conversion chart

The source band and source level columns are Paragon’s sample-test cut-offs, unchanged. The our estimate column widens that level by one, in the direction your score leans inside its own band, because a raw total does not pin a level down on its own — see how to read this chart below.

Every raw score, 38 down to 0 – Reading
Raw correct Source band Source level Our estimate Where in the band
3834–3810–1210–12top band, not narrowed
3734–3810–1210–12top band, not narrowed
3634–3810–1210–12top band, not narrowed
3534–3810–1210–12top band, not narrowed
3434–3810–1210–12top band, not narrowed
3332–3399–10upper half of band
3232–3398–9lower half of band
3129–3188–9upper half of band
3029–3187–8midpoint (rounds down)
2929–3187–8lower half of band
2826–2877–8upper half of band
2726–2876–7midpoint (rounds down)
2626–2876–7lower half of band
2521–2566–7upper half of band
2421–2566–7upper half of band
2321–2565–6midpoint (rounds down)
2221–2565–6lower half of band
2121–2565–6lower half of band
2017–2055–6upper half of band
1917–2055–6upper half of band
1817–2054–5lower half of band
1717–2054–5lower half of band
1612–1644–5upper half of band
1512–1644–5upper half of band
1412–1643–4midpoint (rounds down)
1312–1643–4lower half of band
1212–1643–4lower half of band
118–1133–4upper half of band
108–1133–4upper half of band
98–1133 or belowlower half of band
88–1133 or belowlower half of band
70–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
60–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
50–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
40–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
30–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
20–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
10–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level
00–7Mbelow 3not reported as a level

Cut-offs: Paragon Free Online Sample Test, client-side function calcReadScore. Recorded in docs/READING_FORMAT_NOTES.md §5a.

How to read this chart

Find your raw score, not your percentage

The Reading section has 38 scored questions. Count the ones you got right; that whole number is the only input. There is no penalty for a wrong answer in the published tables, so an unanswered question and a wrong one are worth the same — guess rather than leave a blank.

Read the band, then read the range

A band such as 26–28 → level 7 means every raw score in it returns the same level from the source table. Our estimate then adds one level of give: a score in the lower half of its band reports as 6–7, one in the upper half as 7–8. A score exactly at the midpoint rounds down.

Why a range and not a number

The real exam is equated: levels are computed from the number of points and the difficulty of the questions, and scores are made comparable across test forms. The same raw total can therefore land a level apart on two different forms. Paragon’s two published tables also disagree with each other by a level at several raw scores. A chart that answers with one number is hiding that, and results day is a bad time to find out.

M is not a level

A raw 0–7 returns M in the source code. M is a refusal to report a level rather than a low level, which is why this chart shows it as “below 3”.

One part cannot be converted

This chart converts a full 38-question section. A single part on its own has no published conversion, and scaling one up to 38 would be arithmetic dressed as measurement.

If you have seen 35–38 for the top band

Several widely-copied CELPIP reading charts put the top band at a raw 35–38. Paragon’s own sample-test scoring code puts it at 34–38. We are not guessing between them: the number above was read out of the function the sample test runs in your browser to score itself, calcReadScore, and it is recorded in our research notes at docs/READING_FORMAT_NOTES.md §5a.

If a chart does not say where its numbers came from, that is the thing to check first — on a table like this a one-point shift moves real candidates across a band boundary. One more source worth knowing about is genuinely different rather than a copy: a chart circulating as 35–38 → 12, 33–34 → 11 and so on, which splits the top band into single levels. It departs from Paragon’s code by up to three raw points, and the site publishing it states it has no connection to Paragon and carries about a level of uncertainty. We have kept it out of the table above for that reason.

The other published Reading table

The printed Reading Pro Study Pack carries a second conversion, and it does not match the code. Its bands are wider and they overlap by one or two raw points at every boundary — a raw 33 is inside both the level 9 band and the 10–12 band. That overlap is deliberate: it is Paragon stating in print that the boundary is not sharp. It also disagrees outright in places, putting a raw 24 at level 7 where the code puts it at 6.

Reading – Paragon sample-test cut-offs
Raw correct / 38CELPIP level
34–3810–12
32–339
29–318
26–287
21–256
17–205
12–164
8–113
0–7M
Reading – Study Pack printed bands
CELPIP levelRaw correct / 38
10–1233–38
931–33
828–31
724–28
619–25
515–20
410–16
38–11
M–20–7

Left: Paragon Free Online Sample Test, client-side function calcReadScore. Right: CELPIP Reading Pro Study Pack (PDF, © 2022 Prometric).

What the level means in CLB terms

For levels 3 to 12 the CELPIP level is the CLB level, one to one, so this chart is also a raw-score-to-CLB chart. CELPIP 2 falls into the CLB 1–2 band.

CELPIP level, CLB level and CEFR
CELPIPCLBCEFR
1212C2
1111C1
1010C1
99B2
88B2
77B2
66B1
55B1
44A2
33A2
21–2A1

Do it without counting rows

The calculator does the same lookup, with both tables beside it and the same caveats attached.

CELPIP score calculator   Listening score chart

Where these numbers come from